The program doesn't provide permanent protection or a pathway to citizenship.The short answer is yes and unlike the DACA program, it'd be permanent. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., visits DACA protesters outside of the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday, June 18, 2020, after the court rejected the … “Both administrations have said they are not going to deport the people.”“Here the agency failed to consider the conspicuous issues of whether to retain forbearance [from deportation] and what if anything to do about the hardship to DACA recipients,” Roberts wrote. Read more on our Supreme Court guide.No matter what is happening with DACA, you have rights and knowing them will help keep you and your families empowered during this time.Every family regardless of immigration status should make a family preparedness plan in case of emergency. We address only whether the agency complied with the procedural requirement that it provide a reasoned explanation for its action. "So long as the agency’s determination of illegality is sound, our review should be at an end. "We're not in the clear yet," said Leezia Dhalla, a DACA recipient and press director for the FWD.us advocacy group. When the Department of Homeland Security did so, lawsuits were filed from California to New York and several places in between, and two federal judges blocked the action nationwide.Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote separately in dissent and decried Roberts' ruling for continuing the uncertainty surrounding the program's legal status.The court's conservatives agreed with the conclusion that there was no racial animus. Circuit Court of Appeals decision upholding an … "This is not the case for cutting corners to allow DHS to rely upon reasons absent from its original decision. "From CNN's Catherine E. ShoichetFrom CNN's Maureen Chowdhury, Ariane de Vogue, Devan Cole and Jamie EhrlichThe Obama-era initiative protects from deportation nearly 700,000 young undocumented immigrants who came to the United States as children.Obama called on voters to elect Joe Biden and a Democratic Congress that "protects DREAMers, and finally creates a system that’s truly worthy of this nation of immigrants once and for all.
"President Donald Trump tweeted a quote from Thomas' dissent in which the court's most conservative justice called the ruling "an effort to avoid a politically controversial but legally correct decision. DACA recipients win at the Supreme Court! Given the pathways the court's action leaves open to ending DACA in the future, it offers no long-term guarantee that the program will remain in place."It is inconceivable to require DHS to study reliance interests before rescinding DACA considering how the program was previously defended. "Nonetheless, our fight does not end with the decision by the Supreme Court; our fight continues for permanent protection for DACA recipients and all undocumented people.”A ruling upholding Trump's action would have set off a panic among many DACA recipients and would have led to intense pressure on moderate Republican senators to find some way to offer relief to the hundreds of thousands directly affected and their U.S. citizen family members.Trump added a short time later: "Do you get the impression that the Supreme Court doesn’t like me?"The cases decided by the high court Thursday were launched by blue states, immigrant rights’ advocates and the University of California after Trump embarked on his bid to eliminate the program in 2017.
“That’s why I support immediate passage of the Dream Act and would also support the House-passed Dream and Promise Act.
That prompted immigration rights groups to file court papers urging the justices to leave the program alone.Sen.