Symposium before oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. City of New York. argument first this morning in Case 17-1618, Bostock versus Clayton County, and the consolidated case. 4. There is nothing new in what they wrote.
No.
17-1623. Symposium before oral argument in Kelly v. United States. "Joan Biskupic has created a cottage industry of allegations of court leaks on the left, supposedly proving “deals”.There’s a whole cottage industry of commentators, on both sides, who are now immediately gravitating to extra-judicial theories as to why vote switches and heterodox votes happen. This case was consolidated and decided together with Bostock. October 8, 2019: Oral argument 2. Notice it didn’t change anything in Sibelius, and probably won’t here either.Is it possible that, after reviewing the evidence and arguments, he changed his mind? Bostock v. Clayton Cnty. If Justice Gorsuch or the Chief Justice follow Justice Kagan in defining textualism down, we hope Justice Kavanaugh and the others will explain their errors.If neil and the chief go with Kagan’s textual reasoning on the gay case, how do they split the transexual baby?I do think this is damaging to the Court. Several in the Supreme Court press corps confirmed to me that they heard rumors about the chief justice's shifting position, but "nothing was firm enough for anyone to report on." There were leaks from within the Court that directly influenced this response.
Awarded the National Press Club's Breaking News Award for coverage of the Affordable Care Act decision.Awarded the Webby Award for excellence on the internet.Awarded the Peabody Award for excellence in electronic media.Awarded the American Gavel Award for Distinguished Reporting About the Judiciary to recognize the highest standards of reporting about courts and the justice system.Awarded the Silver Gavel Award by the American Bar Association for fostering the American public’s understanding of the law and the legal system.On Monday, July 6, 2020, Ruth Marcus of the Washington Post delivered the Chautauqua Institution’s 16th annual Robert H. Jackson Lecture on the Supreme Court.Awarded the Sigma Delta Chi deadline reporting award for online coverage of the Affordable Care Act decision. Please explain.
Editor's Note: This case was consolidated for oral argument with Altitude Express v. Zarda, No. - October 8, 2019. 1:16-cv-001460, 2016 WL 9753356; report and recommendation adopted, 2017 WL 4456898; affirmed sub nom. Bostock v. Clayon County Case Overview: Gerald Lynn Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia is a case concerning employment discrimination based on sexual orientation. The following timeline details key events in this case: 1. In October of 2019, the Supreme Court heard the arguments of two cases presenting the same inquiry: whether Title VII’s prohibition on sex discrimination encompasses discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.
Ms. Karlan. Symposium before oral argument in Kelly v. United States. April 22, 2019: The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the case. The near-simultaneous attacks may be a coincidence, or they may mean that conservatives have learned something about what's happening in the Court's chambers—something that worries them. & G.R.
Are conservatives trying to shore up Justice Gorsuch during the home stretch? His and WSJ’s views here are predictable and well-known.I think the basic flaw with Justice Kagan’s argument can be put very simply. The two pieces, published in short succession, with a similar message, remind me of the campaign waged in 2012.Never attribute to a leak — at least without evidence — what can be explained by informed speculation or Court Kremlinology.How are leaks “harmful” to the Court? But it’s not really different in kind from all the others.Senate Republicans announced Monday that the federal government will pay an additional $200 per week in unemployment benefits. This case considered whether Title VII prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.