Vote Trump 2020!” he wrote on Twitter, apparently including the LGBT ruling as well.Both of his appointees dissented on Thursday, though Gorsuch wrote the LGBT rights ruling.WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected President Donald Trump's effort to end legal protections for 650,000 young immigrants, the second stunning election-season rebuke from the court in a week after its ruling that it's illegal to fire people because they're gay or transgender.“We'll keep living our lives in the meantime,” said Cesar Espinosa, who leads the Houston immigration advocacy group FIEL. "We'll figure that out come November," he said. ""We do not decide whether DACA or its rescission are sound policies," Roberts wrote in the majority opinion. Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) demonstrators stand outside the Supreme Court in Washington, DC, on June 15. "I never imagined I would still be fighting for the opportunity to become an American citizen 25 years later. The decision went 5-4 in favor of DACA, the justices turned down the Trump administration quarrel that the eight-year-old Dream Act program is illegal.President Trump is infamous for his anti-immigrant policies. — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 18, 2020 NEXT: Supreme Court Holds Trump Administration Rescission of DACA Was "Arbitrary and Capricious" (Updated)
“We're going to continue to work, continue to advocate.”The justices said the administration did not take the proper steps to end DACA, rejecting arguments that the program is illegal and that courts have no role to play in reviewing the decision to end it. Both academic institutions called for urgent legislation to create a permanent solution for DACA recipients.California State University Chancellor Timothy P. White called the SCOTUS decision an "important victory" but said "it does not protect the program from further challenge, nor does it provide a permanent solution to allow our Dreamers to achieve their aspirational goals. But today is a victory," Dhalla said. "My mind was blown when I found out," he said. Posted: Jun 18, 2020 / 09:08 AM CDT / Updated: Jun 18, 2020 / 09:08 AM CDT. Take a look at the count and names of the officials.John Roberts, Chief of Justice, stated that Trump administration did not fact-check their demands properly to end the program.Supreme Court DACA Vote Breakdown: Chief Justices had the final vote which decided the fate of DACA.
The Supreme Court has ruled on Trump's move to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), a program that protects about 700,000 young undocumented immigrants from being deported.
DACA, and the young ... A Politico/Morning Consult survey conducted earlier this month showed that a majority of those who voted for Trump in 2016 supported protecting Dreamers from deportation. "I'm going to take today as a day of celebration. "President Trump also tweeted that he’ll release a “new list of Conservative Supreme Court Justice nominees, which may include some, or many of those already on the list, by September 1, 2020.”"If my life is on a rotating two-year basis, I can't commit to so many things," he said.The decision provides some reprieve to the thousands of people enrolled in the program. For now, beneficiaries of the program can continue to live and work in the United States without fear of deportation. “We address only whether the agency complied with the procedural requirement that it provide a reasoned explanation for its action. Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor also voted in favor of keeping DACA.The court ruled that the Trump administration's call to end DACA was "arbitrary and capricious." Supreme Court Upholds DACA, Ruling Against Trump Administration The decision is a dramatic victory for immigration advocates and gives a new … We may earn commission from the links on this page.The Obama-era legislation lets children of immigrants brought into the country before their 16th birthday, prior to June 2007, live and work in the U.S. “We address only whether the agency complied with the procedural requirement that it provide a reasoned explanation for its action. "The appropriate recourse is therefore to remand to DHS so that it may consider the problem anew," Roberts wrote, citing failures by the administration to in part consider the hardship to DACA recipients.Connecticut Attorney General William Tong issued the following statement:He added that the administration could remove their protective status at any moment and there are still concerns about the larger undocumented community.The university's statement said, "The next step is for Congress to enact permanent protection for DACA recipients that will provide a pathway to citizenship.